Discussion on “case studies” working groups

[Andrea Tarallo]

Dear all, after discussion with colleagues that have some experience in evaluation of COST Action proposal,
it was suggested to change the WG5-9 names (the “case studies” WGs) to “Thematic Groups”. In this way,
we could better highlight their function us a hub of discussion around the “themes” instead of insist
more on the development of tools (since there is no budget for research and development in COST projects,
this may bring to a bad evaluation in terms of doability of the Action goals).

We are currently drafting the chapter 4. IMPLEMENTATION with a short description of each WG, a list of Activities and tasks,
and the list of deliverables in table.

Please, feel free to suggest modifications, they are very welcome!
Best,
Andrea

[Author]

Posts